- == Spell ranks ==
I was thinking, since many spells will probably have many ranks, listing them several times will most likely end up making the list pretty huge. If we instead use something like: Dark Bargain (R1-R2), the list will only contain each spell once, but still enable us to link to each rank of the spell. I think it can make it look a bit less crowded. Zido [T] [C] 22:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I meant to ask out about that on MSN (wait, your on it now. I'm just lazy). Did we want to do multi implementations or just break it out and describe it in the page itself?
- Daworm talk / cont 23:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Xai 06:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Would like to start up a MSN conversation with both of you, if that's alright. I'm listing the spells with different ranks separately in the table because there is video proof of say, Renewal (Rank 1) being a separate spell from Renewal (Rank 2), ergo, they will have different numbers and stats and whatnot - their only similarity is what they do. However, for that reason I'm with Dawormie on including all the ranks of the spell on one page.
- My windows messenger email address is xaijun88@hotmail.com
- My MSN is the same as the gmail one. Not sure when I'll be on next though.
- Daworm talk / cont 10:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Coloured Lines[]
Did we want them or not. Just with the current sortable tag, it'll make the colouring go all funky when you order a table by level or some other option.
Adding Feat Spells[]
When adding a spell attained from a feat, I suggest we give it a level of 9+feat pts reqs . For example, Agonizing Jolts requires 25pts before you can select it. Since you can only get 25pts at level 34, the spell level is 34. Mutli ranked spells are just base lvl +1 (Wicked Bolts is an example). --Morsvita 04:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)